You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 169 No. 17, September 28, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Editorial
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Men's Health
 •Prostate Disease
 •Oncology
 •Prostate Cancer
 •Quality of Care
 •Patient Safety/ Medical Error
 •Diagnosis
 •Health Care Reform
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

HEALTH CARE REFORM
Weighing the Benefits and Downsides of Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening

Michael Pignone, MD, MPH

Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(17):1554-1556.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Prostate cancer is common (186 000 new US diagnoses in 2008), causing more than 28 000 deaths per year.1 Treatment of clinically detected prostate cancer is effective in reducing prostate cancer mortality in men younger than 65 years but not in older men.2 However, treatment of prostate cancer is associated with considerable morbidity; approximately 50% of men will have impotence, incontinence, or both after treatment, and a few will die as a result of initial treatment.3

Screening with the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) blood test (with or without digital rectal examination) can detect prostate cancer before it becomes symptomatic. However, screening also results in overdiagnosis; that is, it detects more prostate cancers than would otherwise be clinically recognized. Current methods cannot distinguish with great certainty whether a given cancer will progress, making prostate cancer screening a necessarily crude process at best. The decision about whether to be screened for . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

A Model of Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening Outcomes for Low- to High-Risk Men: Information to Support Informed Choices
Kirsten Howard, Alex Barratt, Graham J. Mann, and Manish I. Patel
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(17):1603-1610.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prostate Cancer Screening Decisions: Results From the National Survey of Medical Decisions (DECISIONS Study)
Richard M. Hoffman, Mick P. Couper, Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher, Carrie A. Levin, Mary McNaughton-Collins, Deborah L. Helitzer, John VanHoewyk, and Michael J. Barry
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(17):1611-1618.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.