You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 169 No. 19, October 26, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Review Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •eTable
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Medical Practice, Other
 •Nursing Care
 •Quality of Care
 •Evidence-Based Medicine
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Hypertension
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Potency of Team-Based Care Interventions for Hypertension

A Meta-analysis

Barry L. Carter, PharmD; Meaghan Rogers, PharmD; Jeanette Daly, RN, PhD; Shimin Zheng, PhD; Paul A. James, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(19):1748-1755.

Background  Team-based care is the strategy that has had the greatest effect on improving blood pressure (BP). The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the potency of interventions for BP involving nurses or pharmacists.

Methods  A MEDLINE search for controlled clinical trials that involved a nurse or pharmacist intervention was conducted. Mean reductions in systolic (S) and diastolic (D) BP were determined by 2 reviewers who independently abstracted data and classified the different intervention components.

Results  Thirty-seven articles met the inclusion criteria. Education about BP medications was significantly associated with a reduction in mean BP (–8.75/–3.60 mm Hg). Other strategies that had large effect sizes on SBP include pharmacist treatment recommendations (–9.30 mm Hg), intervention by nurses (–4.80 mm Hg), and use of a treatment algorithm (–4.00 mm Hg). The odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for controlled BP were: nurses, 1.69 (1.48-1.93); pharmacists within primary care clinics, 2.17 (1.75-2.68); and community pharmacists, 2.89 (1.83-4.55). Mean (SD) reductions in SBP were: nursing studies, 5.84 (8.05) mm Hg; pharmacists in clinics, 7.76 (7.81) mm Hg; and community pharmacists, 9.31 (5.00) mm Hg. There were no significant differences between the nursing and pharmacy studies (P ≥ .19).

Conclusions  Team-based care was associated with improved BP control, and individual components of the intervention appeared to predict potency. Implementation of new hypertension guidelines should consider changes in health care organizational structure to include important components of team-based care.


Author Affiliations: Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy (Drs Carter and Rogers), and Department of Family Medicine, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine (Drs Carter, Daly, Zheng, and James), The University of Iowa, Iowa City.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Physician and Pharmacist Collaboration to Improve Blood Pressure Control
Carter et al.
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1996-2002.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.