You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 169 No. 2, January 26, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Informatics/ Internet in Medicine
 •Informatics, Other
 •Medical Practice
 •Health Policy
 •Quality of Care
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Effects of Health Information Technology on Inpatient Care

David W. Bates, MD, MSc

Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(2):105-107.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The costs of health care in the United States are the highest of any country in the world, and they are rapidly becoming unsustainable, affecting the costs of goods and services made in our economy, which is suffering. This is especially problematic since the quality and safety of care nationally is mediocre or worse—the United States actually ranked last among the industrialized nations evaluated in one recent study using preventable mortality as an outcome.1 This has led to intense interest in approaches to improve quality and safety and reduce costs, and increased use of health information technology (HIT) has emerged as one of the key tools for addressing these issues,2 with one study estimating the potential savings over 10 years of increased HIT adoption broadly to be $88 billion, although other studies have reached much higher point estimates.3-4

However, HIT is expensive, and there have . . . [Full Text of this Article]

NEW CONTRIBUTIONS


THE POLICY PERSPECTIVE

AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Clinical Information Technologies and Inpatient Outcomes: A Multiple Hospital Study
Ruben Amarasingham, Laura Plantinga, Marie Diener-West, Darrell J. Gaskin, and Neil R. Powe
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(2):108-114.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Physician Clinical Information Technology and Health Care Disparities
Ketcham et al.
Med Care Res Rev 2009;66:658-681.
ABSTRACT  

Computerized Decision Support for the Cardiovascular Clinician: Applications for Venous Thromboembolism Prevention and Beyond
Piazza and Goldhaber
Circulation 2009;120:1133-1137.
FULL TEXT  

Is More Health Information Technology Better?
Journal Watch Hospital Medicine 2009;2009:1-1.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.