You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 170 No. 14, July 26, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Original Investigation
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (12)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Men's Health
 •Prostate Disease
 •Oncology
 •Prostate Cancer
 •Quality of Care
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Radiation Therapy
 •Diagnosis
 •Screening
 •Less Is More
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

LESS IS MORE
Risk Profiles and Treatment Patterns Among Men Diagnosed as Having Prostate Cancer and a Prostate-Specific Antigen Level Below 4.0 ng/mL

Yu-Hsuan Shao, PhD; Peter C. Albertsen, MD; Calpurnyia B. Roberts, PhD; Yong Lin, PhD; Amit R. Mehta, MD; Mark N. Stein, MD; Robert S. DiPaola, MD; Grace L. Lu-Yao, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(14):1256-1261. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2010.221

Background  Despite controversy over the benefit of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening, little is known about risk profiles and treatment patterns in men diagnosed as having prostate cancer who have a PSA value less than or equal to 4.0 ng/mL.

Methods  We used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results system to describe patient characteristics and treatment patterns in the cases of 123 934 men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer from 2004 to 2006. Age-standardized treatment rates were calculated in 5-year age strata. Logistic regression was used to quantify the odds ratios (ORs) of men with low- and high-risk disease and the use of radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiation therapy (RT).

Results  Men with a PSA level of 4.0 ng/mL or lower represent 14% of incident prostate cancer cases. Fifty-four percent of men diagnosed as having prostate cancer and PSA levels lower than 4.0 ng/mL harbor low-risk disease (stage, ≤T2a, PSA level, ≤10 ng/mL, and Gleason score, ≤6), but over 75% of them received RP or RT. Men with screen-detected prostate cancer and PSA values lower than 4 ng/mL were 1.49 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38-1.62) and 1.39 (95% CI, 1.30-1.49) times more likely to receive RP and RT, respectively, and were less likely to have high-grade disease than men who had non–screen-detected prostate cancer (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.60-0.76).

Conclusions  Most men diagnosed as having prostate cancer with a PSA threshold below 4.0 ng/mL had low-risk disease but underwent aggressive local therapy. Lowering the biopsy threshold but retaining our inability to distinguish indolent from aggressive cancers might increase the risk of overdiagnosis and overtreatment.


Author Affiliations: The Dean and Betty Gallo Prostate Cancer Center (Drs Mehta, Stein, DiPaola, and Lu-Yao) at the Cancer Institute of New Jersey (Drs Shao, Roberts, Lin, Mehta, Stein, DiPaola, and Lu-Yao), New Brunswick; Division of Urology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington (Dr Albertsen); Departments of Biostatistics (Dr Lin) and Epidemiology (Dr Lu-Yao) at The School of Public Health, and Department of Medicine (Drs Mehta, Stein, DiPaola, and Lu-Yao), University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Piscataway.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

PSA: Possible Surgery Avoidance With Use of Free PSA
Alan I. Glaser
Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(6):594-595.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Time to Rethink PSA Screening
Paras B. Singh, Hashim U. Ahmed, Lucy Simmons, Alex Freeman, and Mark Emberton
Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(6):595.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

The Cautionary Tale of PSA Testing: Comment on "Risk Profiles and Treatment Patterns Among Men Diagnosed as Having Prostate Cancer and a Prostate-Specific Antigen Level Below 4.0 ng/mL"
Richard M. Hoffman and Steven B. Zeliadt
Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(14):1262-1263.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Screening for Prostate Cancer: A Review of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Chou et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2011;155:762-771.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Novel Therapies for Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Dayyani et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2011;103:1665-1675.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

PSA: Possible Surgery Avoidance With Use of Free PSA
Glaser
Arch Intern Med 2011;171:594-595.
FULL TEXT  

Time to Rethink PSA Screening
Singh et al.
Arch Intern Med 2011;171:595-595.
FULL TEXT  

Time to Rethink PSA Screening--Reply
Shao and Lu-Yao
Arch Intern Med 2011;171:595-596.
FULL TEXT  

The Science and Art of Prostate Cancer Screening
Yao and Lu-Yao
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2011;103:450-451.
FULL TEXT  

Efficacy and Safety of Dutasteride on Prostate Cancer Risk Reduction in Asian Men: The Results from the REDUCE Study
Akaza et al.
Jpn J Clin Oncol 2011;41:417-423.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Treating Prostate Cancer in Men with Low Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels
JWatch General 2010;2010:1-1.
FULL TEXT  

All you need to read in the other general journals
BMJ 2010;341:c4007-c4007.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2010 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.