You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 171 No. 1, January 10, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Editorial
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care
 •Evidence-Based Medicine
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Practice Guidelines

Belief, Criticism, and Probability

John H. Powers, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(1):15-17. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2010.453

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Every day, health care providers aid patients in making decisions about their health. The process by which providers acquire, assimilate, and implement information to make decisions involves evaluation of published clinical research studies and reliance on early medical training, discussions with colleagues, local policies, personal clinical experience, and external influences.1 Another important source of information is practice guidelines developed and published by professional medical societies.

Guidelines can serve a useful purpose for providers by presenting a compilation of available evidence in a given therapeutic area. Guidelines can also help the provision of care, because standardization may help streamline processes for implementation of interventions. In some circumstances, quasi-experimental studies show an association between following recommendations in guidelines and improved outcomes for patients.

However, guidelines are not just summaries of the evidence. They are also interpretations of that evidence by guideline authors who bring to the process their . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION
Author Affiliation: Division of Clinical Research, Scientific Applications International Corporation (SAIC) in Support of NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Analysis of Overall Level of Evidence Behind Infectious Diseases Society of America Practice Guidelines
Dong Heun Lee and Ole Vielemeyer
Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(1):18-22.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

NCCN Guidelines and the International Community
Ward
J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2011;9:133-134.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2011 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.