You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 100 No. 2, AUGUST 1957 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (14)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Height, Weight, and Their Ratio in the Accelerated Form of Primary Hypertension

GEORGE A. PERERA, M.D.; ALBERT DAMON, M.D.

AMA Arch Intern Med. 1957;100(2):263-265.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The accelerated ("malignant") form of hypertension is characterized by the presence of pathological changes indicative of a widespread necrotizing arteriolitis. Strong but not certain evidence for this diagnosis may be obtained on clinical grounds, particularly when patients are encountered with established diastolic hypertension, with rapidly progressive renal damage, and usually—although not necessarily—with retinopathy and papilledema.

Separation of the accelerated form from other types of hypertension was made by Volhard and Fahr, in 1914.1 Since that time there have been numerous descriptions of its clinical features and its rather uniform rapidly downhill course.2-5 It is accepted generally that this condition occurs infrequently de novo, appearing more often after the previous development of primary (essential) or secondary hypertension.

Discussion continues as to whether one is dealing with a phase dependent solely upon the intensity of the hypertensive process or whether a superimposed and qualitatively different mechanism is responsible.6 The . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

New York

From the Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and the Presbyterian Hospital. Fellow of the American Heart Association (Dr. Damon).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 19, 1957.

This study was supported by grants from the National Heart Institute (U. S. P. H. S.), the Union County Heart Association (New Jersey), the Albert and Mary Lasker Foundation, the Albert H. and Jessie D. Wiggin Foundation, and the Irwin Strasburger Memorial Medical Foundation.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1957 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.