You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 100 No. 3, SEPTEMBER 1957 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CASE REPORTS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (9)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Severe Hypotensive Crises Following Treatment with Meprobamate

P. A. L. SCOTT, M.B., Ch.B.; L. GRIMSHAW, M.B., Ch.B.; H. M. P. MOLONY, M.B., Ch.B.

AMA Arch Intern Med. 1957;100(3):484-486.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Meprobamate ( 2-methyl-2-n-propyl-1,3-propanediol dicarbamate), marketed in the United Kingdom as Equanil, Miltown, and Mepavlon, is in common use as a tranquilizer in psychiatric states characterized by anxiety and tension. Berger, from whose laboratories it comes, describes three pharmacological properties: a muscle-relaxant action, an anticonvulsant action, and a tranquilizing action. He states that it acts on the central nervous system only, without affecting autonomic functions; it seems to have a unique selective action on the thalamus.

Clinical evaluation is far from complete, but meprobamate seems to be more effective in neurotic than in psychotic conditions. It seemed to us to have two advantages over chlorpromazine: It acted much more quickly when given orally, and it was reported to have no troublesome complications, such as jaundice or agranulocytosis. Berger stated that drowsiness, seldom inconvenient, and infrequent allergic reactions were the only side-effects. More recently, however, Friedman and Marmelzat have described cutaneous, muscular, gastrointestinal, . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Manchester, England

Department of Psychiatry, Manchester Royal Infirmary.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication April 11, 1957.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1957 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.