You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 100 No. 3, SEPTEMBER 1957 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  BOOKS
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Radicular Syndromes, with Emphasis on Chest Pain Simulating Coronary Disease.

By David Davis, M.D. Price, $6.50. Pp. 266, with 69 illustrations. The Year Book Publishers, Inc., 200 E. Illinois St., Chicago 11, 1957.

William B. Bean, M.D., Reviewer

AMA Arch Intern Med. 1957;100(3):516-517.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

This book presents the interesting thesis that much pain in the chest which masquerades as coronary artery disease really comes from lesions impinging on the sensitive posterior spinal roots. There is, of course, much evidence to suggest that the main thesis is correct. Mistakes in diagnosis are likely to be made in the direction of misinterpretation of pain by reading into many pains an unwarranted diagnosis of angina pectoris, acute coronary insufficiency, or myocardial infarction. While too many people accept uncritically the notion that every pain in the chest comes from the heart, one gets the impression after reading Davis' book that there is an opposite tendency here for him to read into a great many pains an interpretation as one of the radicular syndromes. I think on the whole this is a healthy influence, but it is remarkable that so much of the evidence is post hoc, that there . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1957 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.