You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 100 No. 5, NOVEMBER 1957 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  URINARY TRACT INFECTION
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (607)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Bacteriuria and the Diagnosis of Infections of the Urinary Tract

With Observations on the Use of Methionine as a Urinary Antiseptic

EDWARD H. KASS, M.D., Ph.D.

AMA Arch Intern Med. 1957;100(5):709-714.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Pyelonephritis and related infections of the urinary tract are among the most frequently encountered, most frequently undiagnosed, and most difficult to manage of all infections. The lack of clear views of the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infections of the urinary tract is well recognized.1-3

A few selected data indicate the magnitude of the problem.

1. Pyelonephritis is the commonest disease of the kidneys at autopsy. Active pyelonephritis has been found in 10% to 20% of autopsies in several general hospitals,4-6 and healed pyelonephritis occurs about as frequently as does active pyelonephritis.6

2. Pyelonephritis has been implicated, with varying degrees of evidence, in such disorders as hypertension, chronic renal insufficiency, toxemias of pregnancy, various disturbances in electrolyte metabolism, diabetes mellitus, pregnancy, and stone formation.

3. Despite the importance of this group of diseases the diagnosis of infection of the urinary tract is made in only about 20% . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Boston

From the Thorndike Memorial Laboratory, Second and Fourth (Harvard) Medical Services, Boston City Hospital, and the Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication June 4, 1957.

Aided by grants from the National Institutes of Health, United States Public Health Service.

Read in the Symposium on Urinary Tract Infection before the Section on Experimental Medicine and Therapeutics at the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Medical Association, New York, June 4, 1957.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1957 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.