You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 101 No. 5, MAY 1958 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  BOOKS
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Antikoagulantien.

By Prof. Dr. Eberhard Perlick. Pp. 290. Price, 36 marks. VEB Georg Thieme, Hainstr. 17/19 Aufg. C, Leipzig C. 1, 1957.

William B. Bean, M.D., Reviewer

AMA Arch Intern Med. 1958;101(5):1009.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Guided no doubt by the famous statement of Cruveilhiers "La phlébite domine en quelque sorte la pathologie tout entiére," which he quotes in the summary, Professor Perlick in his monograph presents the broad aspects of thromboembolism as the background for his main topic: anticoagulants. A fairly detailed discussion of the coagulation reaction, including many of the newest concepts and proposed factors, serves as the introduction. This is followed by a comprehensive account of the common anticoagulants. It includes the biochemistry, physiological action, toxicity, therapeutic indication, and control.

A section devoted to the nervous and hormonal factors in their relation to blood coagulation is stimulating and informative, as is to be expected, since Professor Perlick himself has been an important contributor to this field. Unfortunately, a little too much importance is attached to the significance of the clotting time. The meticulous review of the old literature is of dubious value. Thus, . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1958 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.