You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 102 No. 6, DECEMBER 1958 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (21)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Results of Mitral Commissurotomy

Follow-Up of Three and One-Half to Seven Years

F. HENRY ELLIS, Jr., M.D.; DANIEL C. CONNOLLY, M.D.; JOHN W. KIRKLIN, M.D.; ROBERT L. PARKER, M.D.

AMA Arch Intern Med. 1958;102(6):928-935.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Ten years have passed since the first successful mitral commissurotomy was performed.1 During these years countless such operations have been done by surgeons all over the world, and there have been many reports of the early results of this procedure. Long-term follow-up studies are essential in the evaluation of any operative procedure. Studies of this type that have been reported 2-8 indicate that the condition of between two-thirds and three-fourths of the patients operated on is improved. Now that it is possible to operate successfully on the open heart, it is more important than ever to evaluate the long-term results of a closed technique. The question will inevitably arise as to whether open-heart techniques should be used in the treatment of some or even all patients with mitral stenosis. With this in mind the present study was undertaken. The first 131 patients operated on at the Mayo Clinic, of . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Rochester, Minn.

Section of Surgery (Dr. Ellis and Dr. Kirklin) and Section of Medicine (Dr. Connolly and Dr. Parker), Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation. The Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minn., is a part of the Graduate School of the University of Minnesota.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication June 24, 1958.

Read before the Section on Internal Medicine at the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Medical Association, San Francisco, June 24, 1958.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1958 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.