You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 103 No. 3, MARCH 1959 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Use of Chlorothiazide in the Nephrotic Syndrome

G. E. BURCH, M.D.; H. AUBREY WHITE, Jr., M.D.

AMA Arch Intern Med. 1959;103(3):369-380.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The new diuretic agent, chlorothiazide (6-chloro-7-sulfamyl-1,2,4-benzot benzothiadiazine-1,1-dioxide),* is useful in the treatment of many clinical disorders, including congestive heart failure, cirrhosis, nephrosis, essential hypertension, premenstrual edema, and toxemia of pregnancy.1-9 Among its various clinical advantages are (1) remarkable effectiveness when administered orally; (2) prompt diuretic action, consisting of water diuresis, natruresis, and chloruresis but only minimal kaluresis; (3) persistent activity and lack of tolerance until edema subsides; (4) antihypertensive action, and (5) minimal side-effects or toxic reactions.

Basic pharmacologic studies have demonstrated that chlorothiazide inhibits carbonic anhydrase in vitro but not significantly in vivo,2 and clinical trials in man indicate that its diuretic action is qualitatively similar to that of the mercurial diuretics. In short-term animal experiments,1 maximal diuresis was observed at 40 minutes after intravenous administration, with a total duration of effect of about 4 hours. The peak response after oral administration occurred at 4 hours, . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

New Orleans

From the Department of Medicine, Tulane University, School of Medicine and Charity Hospital of Louisiana at New Orleans.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication Aug. 1, 1958.

Aided by Grants from Public Health Service (H143) and the Thibodeaux Research Foundation.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1959 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.