You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 105 No. 1, JANUARY 1960 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  BOOKS
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Coronary Heart Disease.

By John William Gofman, M.D., Ph.D. Price, $8. Pp. xx+, 353, with no illustrations. Charles C Thomas, Publisher 301-327 E. Lawrence Ave., Springfield, Ill.; Ryerson Press, 299 Queen St. W. Toronto; Black-well Scientific Publciations, 24-25 Broad St., Oxford, England, 1959.

A. C. Corcoran, M.D., Reviewer

AMA Arch Intern Med. 1960;105(1):171-172.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The background of this book is not stated, although it is relevant to its review. Some 10 years ago the author achieved quantitative, differential separation of low-density serum lipoproteins by adjusting the medium to density 1.06 and photographically recording flotation rates during ultracentrifugation. This brilliant technical development was followed by enthusiastic reports that showed a close association between high concentrations of lipoprotein class Sf 12-20 and previous myocardial infarction. Subsequent data extended the correlation to lipoproteins Sf 20-400. The data were numerically expressed by weighing factors as an 'Atherogenic Index,' based on lipoprotein distribution and diastolic pressure. As the author Indicates, this term implies a causal association which is not fully established and which is not essential to this presentation, although he adduces evidence to suggest that it may be valid. His concepts are developed calmly, clearly, and persuasively, with only faint gleams of the contentiousness and . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1960 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.