You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 105 No. 3, MARCH 1960 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  BOOKS
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Symposium on Stress and Circulation,

The Wayne County Chapter of The Michigan Academy of General Practice. By Gustav J. Martin, Sc.D., Charles H. Birnberg, M.D., Jerome Weiss, M.D., Harold D. Kautz, M.D., Art P. R. James, M.D., Robert H. Monninger, M.D., and Thomas F. Dowd, M.D. Price, not given. Pp. 63, with no illustrations. The Wayne County Chapter of The Michigan Academy of General Practice, Detroit, Mich., 1959.

William B. Bean, M.D., Reviewer

AMA Arch Intern Med. 1960;105(3):498.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Here is an example of the confusion or corruption of physicians who beat the drum in a symposium on treating "stress" with hesperidin. This throw-away item appeared under the aegis of the Wayne County Chapter of The Michigan Academy of General Practice. Much scientific work has indicated that hesperidin is a not inexpensive placebo. Controlled studies reported by Shils and Goodhart indicated that such flavonoids are without therapeutic effect. It is not surprising that they have been used to treat hypothetical states or diseases for which there is no known cure and others for which better methods of therapy are known. Perhaps the best that can be said for the papers is that they represent the testimonial approach—statements unsupported by evidence. The papers reveal ignorance of disease and of the experimental method. The Michigan Academy of General Practice has done itself and medicine conspicuous disservice in supporting the hard sell . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1960 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.