You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 106 No. 4, OCTOBER 1960 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Glaucoma.

Edited by Frank W. Newell, M.D. Price, $8. Pp. 257, with 108 illustrations. Josiah Macy, Jr., Foundation Publications, 16 W. 46th St., New York 36, 1960.

Dr. A. Braley, Reviewer

Arch Intern Med. 1960;106(4):586.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The Macy Foundation conferences are so well known to all medical groups that the technique need not be reviewed here. This transcription of the fourth conference on glaucoma held in March, 1959, is more or less a follow-up on the preceding three conferences. In this conference the anatomic and histological changes were emphasized. The trabecular structure was examined with the electron microscope in extremely thin sections in an attempt to augment the findings of the light microscope. Studies were presented in which material was injected into the eye, followed by electron-microscope examination of the tissues. This was done in an effort to determine the mechanism of filtration through the trabecular apparatus.

In other discussions, utilization of new histochemical techniques of differential staining are presented, with neophrene casts of the chamber angle and the canal Schlemm. Considerable discussion followed pertaining to the use of postmortem vs. fresh material. There is no . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1960 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.