You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 106 No. 5, NOVEMBER 1960 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Clinical Endocrinology, I.

By E. B. Astwood. Price, $18.75. Pp. not given, with many illustrations. Grune & Stratton, Inc., 381 Fourth Avenue, New York 16. 1960.

Neil J. Elgee, M.D., Reviewer

Arch Intern Med. 1960;106(5):738-739.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

This volume presents postgraduate endocrinology—clinical, current, and choice. It is designed as Number One of a series of expansions and revisions of Progress in Clinical Endocrinology, published in 1950. In his preface to the present work, Dr. Astwood notes that should projected future volumes of the series "not transpire, the 'One' will at least serve as a distinctive mark of bibliopegic decoration!" He has assembled articles of clinical importance from 82 top-rank contributors. The subject matter is assembled under eight categories: pituitary, thyroid, parathyroid, pancreas, adrenal, reproductive system, hormone assays and special tests, and a miscellaneous group of selected topics. Virtually every major area of recent progress in endocrinology receives attention, especially where new work is changing current clinical practice. There are a few standard review articles of some length, but the majority are much shorter, sometimes disappointingly so. Few are narrow, however, and most provide the reader with some . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1960 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.