You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 106 No. 6, DECEMBER 1960 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Nutritional Status U.S.A.

Edited by Agnes Fay Morgan. Price, single copies, no cost. Pp. 131, with 33 illustrations, 97 figures, 6 tables. California Agricultural Experiment Station, Bulletin 769, Berkeley, Calif., 1959.

Dr. Margaret Oiilson, Reviewer

Arch Intern Med. 1960;106(6):901-902.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

One of the problems of interpretation of nutritional and metabolic studies of the sick is the paucity of control data which delineates the range of variation in persons free from disease. In 1935 the first group of investigators from the Land Grant Colleges of the North Central area banded together to develop methods for measuring nutritional status of healthy populations. Since these investigators were members of Home Economics faculties and both money and facilities were limited, they chose to work with healthy young women as this was the human commodity at hand. During the next 10 years more than 30 papers were published describing the growth, development, biochemistry, physiology, and eating practices of healthy women 17 to 25 years of age. More importantly, the investigators and their students gained a significant experience in cooperative research. The passage by Congress of the Research and Marketing Act, later a part of . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1960 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.