This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (26)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

A Diagnostic Challenge

WILLIAM C. MIEHER, JR., M.D.; YVAN THIBAUDEAU, M.D.; BOY FRAME, M.D.

Arch Intern Med. 1961;107(3):361-371.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Despite the numerous articles and reviews that have appeared on the subject of hyperparathyroidism, the diagnosis of this condition continues to be frequently overlooked. The late diagnosis of hyperparathyroidism, after the appearance of cystic bone changes and multiple kidney stones, should be a thing of the past; there are numerous clinical clues that, when properly evaluated, should suggest the diagnosis early in the course of the disease. The role of serendipity in this diagnosis has been emphasized,¹ but assumes less importance the more intimate knowledge one has with the disease.

In this article we attempt to outline an all-inclusive diagnostic approach to hyperparathyroidism. We will review our experience at the Henry Ford Hospital and correlate it with those of others as reported in the literature. From 1934 to 1959, there have been 21 proven cases of primary hyperparathyroidism at this hospital. This is a relatively small series when compared . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
DETROIT

From the Medical Department, Henry Ford Hospital.

Footnotes
Submitted for publication April 12, 1960.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?