You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 108 No. 2, Aug 1961 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Clinical Applications of Cardiopulmonary Physiology

By M. Henry Williams, Jr., M.D. Price, $7.50. Pp. 233, with 27 illustrations. Paul B. Hoeber, Inc., Medical Book Department of Harper & Brothers, 49 E. 33d St., New York 16, 1960.

David W. Cugell, M.D., Reviewer

Arch Intern Med. 1961;108(2):326-327.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

& Brothers, 49 E. 33d St., New York 16, 1960.

The rapid expansion of physiological knowledge has brought with it a new type of "specialist"—the clinical physiologist. In the cardiac and pulmonary fields great strides have been made by those capable of applying physiological principles and techniques to clinical problems. Proper clinical management demands a deep understanding of physiological principles. Dr. Williams has bravely set out to provide us with an explanation of basic physiologic principles as they apply to heart and lung function, how they become deranged in disease, and also to explain the physiological bases for some of the more common and important symptoms. I say bravely because it is inevitable that the author of such a text will incur the adverse criticism of both physiologist and clinician for what both probably consider a cursory and inadequate approach to the subject. Such criticism is grossly unfair. This is . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1961 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.