You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 109 No. 2, Feb 1962 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Treatment of Hypertension

By Sir George Pickering, William Ian Cranston, and Michael Andrew Pears. Price, not given. Pp. xi + 175. American Lecture Series; Charles C Thomas, Publisher, 301-327 E. Lawrence Ave., Springfield, Ill., 1961.

A. C. Corcoran, M.D., Reviewer

Arch Intern Med. 1962;109(2):249.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The senior author's current interest in casting out hypertension as an entity (vide his new book on The Nature of Hypertension) gives this volume some of the flavor of a text on the chemotherapy of Mortal Error by a Christian Scientist. This paradox is not wholly resolved by the opening statement that "this little book has provided the authors with an opportunity to try to reconcile the antithesis between the science and the art of medicine." I do not admit an anti-thesis exists; in the last analysis, science is artistic and art is scientific, and they are the two sides of the coin of human or intellectual endeavor which should fuse knowledge (science) with wisdom (art). Medicine that is self-consciously "artistic" to the exclusion of science is close to quackery, and medicine that tries to be "scientific" to the exclusion of art has the same vice. But, admitting their premise . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1962 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.