You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 109 No. 3, Mar 1962 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Relief of Symptoms

By Walter Modell, M.D., F.A.C.P. Second edition. Price, $11.50. Pp. 374. The C. V. Mosby Company, 3207 Washington Blvd., St. Louis 3, 1961.

Louis Lasagna, M.D., Reviewer

Arch Intern Med. 1962;109(3):369-370.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Dr. Modell has the background and experience for writing an excellent book on the relief of symptoms. Why, then, is this book disappointing? Perhaps a review of its faults may explain the paradox:

  1. The material is poorly edited. One finds non sequiturs, clumsy phrases, and repetitiousness (plus more than a few typographical mistakes not caught in proof).
  2. There are a fair number of errors of fact, and a good many statements which seem highly questionable. Examples: (a) Benzedrine is not "l-amphetamine"; (b) Preludin and Meratran really aren't "amphetamines"; (c) the development of tolerance to barbiturates is really not "unsettled"; it occurs without question under certain circumstances; (d) codeine can depress the respiratory center; (e) pentobarbital and secobarbital should not be differentially classified, in view of their essential similarity; (f) ephedrine and amphetamine are hardly "potent" MAO inhibitors; (g) the decrease in appetite after amphetamine is certainly not a
. . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1962 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.