You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 112 No. 2, AUGUST 1963 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (37)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Diagnosis of Renal Arterial Lesions

LEIGH WILSON, MB, MRCP; HARRIET P. DUSTAN, MD; IRVINE H. PAGE, MD; E. F. POUTASSE, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1963;112(2):270-277.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The diagnosis of renal arterial disease is made by arteriography, but, at the present time, this technique is not used in every hypertensive patient. Since renal arterial stenosis often causes a remedial type of hypertension, arteriography should be performed whenever occlusive disease is suspected. Accordingly, we reviewed our six years' experience with diagnosis of these lesions to determine the features of the usual examination of the hypertensive patient which suggest the presence of renal stenosis and can serve as indications for renal arteriography. This report describes the importance of some clinical and urographic features in the diagnosis of this type of renal hypertension.

Clinical Material

There were 139 patients; 82 had unilateral main renal arterial disease, and 35 had bilateral lesions; 20 had stenosis of one or more primary arterial branches to one kidney, and 2 had bilateral branch arterial disease.*

To determine whether these patients differed greatly from essential . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

CLEVELAND

Formerly Graduate Research Fellow, Research Division, Cleveland Clinic Foundation (Dr. Wilson); staff member Research Division, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, (Dr. Dustan); Director, Research Division, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, (Dr. Page); staff member, Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation (Dr. Poutasse).

From the Research Division and Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation.


Footnotes

Received for publication Feb 8, 1963; accepted Feb 12.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1963 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.