This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on Web of Science (22)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

RALPH L. ENGLE, JR., MD

Arch Intern Med. 1963;112(4):520-529.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Many physicians distrust philosophical discussions and dismiss them as having no practical value. Nevertheless, if we are to gain further insight into the meaning and limitations of medical diagnosis, we must discard our prejudices and review some of the philosophical foundations on which diagnosis rests. Without doubt the most important philosophical questions for our review involve the theory of universals and the closely related problems of classification, definition, nomenclature, induction, and deduction.

The theory of universals¹ attempts to define the relationship between particulars, as found in individual observation, and general ideas or universals. Consideration of the theory of universals is important in many fields, and its particular significance for medicine lies in the way it forces us to focus on a frequent dichotomy in our thought. Every time a physician thinks about a patient or makes a diagnosis, he must consider the patient as an individual and at the . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
NEW YORK

Associate Professor of Medicine.

Department of Medicine, the New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center.

Footnotes
Received for publication Feb 9, 1963; accepted May 6.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?