You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 113 No. 1, JANUARY 1964 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (8)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Occult Primary Renal Disease in the Hypertensive Patient

ARNOLD S. ROLAND, MD; EUGENE A. HILDRETH, MD; ALFRED M. SELLERS, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1964;113(1):101-110.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Introduction

Since Goldblatt's original description of the production of hypertension by partial constriction of the renal artery of dogs in 1934,1 there has been increasing interest in the relationship of the kidney to human hypertension. Clinical interest was originally confined largely to parenchymal renal disease, especially unilateral pyelonephritis, hydronephrosis, and the atrophic kidney. A large number of hypertensive patients with unilateral parenchymal renal disease were subjected to nephrectomy. Enthusiasm for this procedure, though initially high, was dampened considerably by Homer Smith's reviews of the results in 1943 2 and again in 1956.3 In the latter report, only 26% of 575 unilateral nephrectomies had resulted in cure of hypertension.

During the past five years, due largely to advances in vascular reconstructive surgery, increasing attention has been directed towards renovascular disease. Here, the results of surgery have been considerably better. In carefully selected patients there has been a 40% to . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

PHILADELPHIA

Resident in Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (Dr. Roland); Associate Professor of Medicine, Chief, Allergy and Immunology Section, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, John and Mary R. Markle Scholar in Medicine, 1958-1963 (Dr. Hildreth); Assistant Clinical Professor of Medicine, Chief, Hypertension Section, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (Dr. Sellers).; From the Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania.


Footnotes

Received for publication May 14, 1963; accepted July 3.

Presented at the American College of Physicians Regional Meeting (Southern California), Coronado, Calif, Feb 15-17, 1963.

Support for these studies was provided by the Heart Association of Southeastern Pennsylvania and the Huffnagle Fund for Hypertension Research.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1964 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.