You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 113 No. 2, FEBRUARY 1964 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Etiology of Serious Reactions to Oral Cholecystography

FRANK J. SANEN, MD; RALPH M. MYERSON, MD; J. GEORGE TEPLICK, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1964;113(2):241-247.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Introduction

Despite their widespread use, the contrast media employed for oral cholecystography have only rarely been associated with serious untoward reactions.1 Gastrointestinal upsets, usually nausea and diarrhea, are common but transient and mild. Hypersensitivity reactions to oral cholecystographic media are rare and usually manifested as immediate or briefly delayed anaphylactic reactions secondary to antibodies already present in the body. Occasionally, hypersensitivity takes the form of a serum-sickness reaction characterized by rash and fever occurring three to eight days after the administration of the medium.2

Recently there has been an increasing number of reports suggesting that the oral cholecystographic media may produce reactions of a more serious nature. In 1958 Littman and Marcus3 reported coronary insufficiency and myocardial infarction occurring shortly after the administration of iodoalphionic acid (Priodax) and iopanoic acid (Telepaque). They postulated a vasovagal reflex associated with bradycardia, sweating, and hypotension as the responsible mechanism.

In . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

HICKSVILLE, NY; PHILADELPHIA

Assistant Chief, Medical Service, Veterans Administration Hospital, and Clinical Professor of Medicine, Woman's Medical College of Pennsylvania (Dr. Myerson); Associate in Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Director of Radiology, Kensington Hospital and Visiting Chief of Radiology, Philadelphia General Hospital (Dr. Teplick).


Footnotes

Received for publication July 12, 1963; accepted Aug 14.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1964 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.