You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 115 No. 2, February 1965 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  ARTICLES
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (130)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Drug-Induced Liver Disease

A Penalty For Progress

HANS POPPER, MD; EMANUEL RUBIN, MD; DANIEL GARDIOL, MD; FENTON SCHAFFNER, MD; FIORENZO PARONETTO, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1965;115(2):128-136.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

DRUG-INDUCED hepatic injury, particularly that associated with jaundice, is becoming more frequent because of the increasing use of potent drugs. Nevertheless, its pathogenesis remains mysterious, and its classifications is difficult. Initially, drug-induced hepatic injury followed use of established hepatotoxins as exemplified by diethylene glycol, the vehicle of an early sulfonamide preparation which proved to be a fatal poison.1 Subsequently, new disease entities were recognized after patients were exposed to drugs. For instance, intrahepatic cholestasis, then called intrahepatic biliary obstruction, following the administration of organic arsenicals, was reported by Hanger and Gutman.2 This led to the appreciation of intrahepatic cholestasis caused by agents other than drugs.3 Today, however, confusion about the many hepatic changes associated with drug therapy produces apprehension on the part of the physician when prescribing which sometimes protects the patient but almost as frequently prevents beneficial treatment or causes senseless testing for hepatotoxicity. The . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations



NEW YORK

From the Department of Pathology, The Mount Sinai Hospital.


Footnotes



Received for publication Aug 13, 1964; accepted Aug 17.

Reprint requests to New York, NY 10029 (Dr. Popper).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1965 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.