You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 116 No. 1, July 1965 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (241)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Diagnostic Value of Scintillation Scanning of the Liver

Follow-Up of 1,000 Studies

JOHN G. McAFEE, MD; ROBERT G. AUSE, MD; HENRY N. WAGNER, JR., MD

Arch Intern Med. 1965;116(1):95-110.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

FOR 13 YEARS, radioactive colloids have been successfully used for the measurement of hepatic blood flow in man.32 Labeled dyes, such as rose bengal I 131 have been employed to assess the function of the parenchymal cells of the liver. These techniques have not become widely used, because alterations in liver blood flow occur relatively late in hepatic diseases and because the labeled dye studies convey essentially the same information as the conventional liver function test with sulfobromophthalein (Bromsulphalein). In contrast, the technique of scintillation scanning following injection of these labeled materials has steadily increased in popularity since the first successful demonstration of intrahepatic metastases by Friedell et al in 1957.15 With this method, the size, shape, and position of the liver can be assessed and focal intrahepatic lesions demonstrated. This diagnostic information cannot be provided by any known radiographic technique. Many authors have reported their results in . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

BALTIMORE

From the departments of radiology and radiological science, the Johns Hopkins schools of medicine and hygiene and public health. Professor and Chairman, Department of Radiology, State University of New York, formerly Associate Professor of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins Hospital schools of medicine and hygiene and public health (Dr. McAfee); Assistant Resident in Radiology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital (Dr. Ause); and Associate Professor Internal Medicine and Radiology and Radiological Science, the Johns Hopkins Hospital schools of medicine and hygiene and public health (Dr. Wagner).


Footnotes

Received for publication Dec 30, 1964; accepted Jan 22, 1965.

Read before the Clinical Convention of the American Medical Association, Miami, Nov 30, 1964.

Reprint requests to 750 E Adams St, Syracuse, NY 13210 (Dr. Wagner).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1965 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.