You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 116 No. 3, September 1965 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (27)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Clinical Evaluation of Aortic Regurgitation

With Special Reference to a Neglected Sign: the Popliteal-Brachial Pressure Gradient

MARTIN J. FRANK, MD; PABLO CASANEGRA, MD; ANGELO J. MIGLIORI, MD; GILBERT E. LEVINSON, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1965;116(3):357-365.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

AORTIC INSUFFICIENCY was first clearly described by Cowper in 1705 and the associated collapsing pulse by Vieussens in 1715.1 After Corrigan's classical clinicopathological correlation was presented in 1823,1 interest was primarily directed toward differentiating the various causes of the valve damage. With the advent of modern sphygmomanometry in 1896, attention was turned again to the physical findings in this disease and it was recognized that characteristic features are low diastolic pressure, increased systolic pressure, and wide pulse pressure. In addition, in 1909 Hill and associates 2,3 reported finding a consistently higher systolic pressure in the leg than in the arm in patients with aortic regurgitation, but not in normal subjects. Since that time, little has been added to the evaluation of this lesion, except for the description of various radiologic and electrocardiographic criteria of left ventricular enlargement and hypertrophy, which are pathologic concomitants of the disease.

All of . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

JERSEY CITY, NJ

From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Medicine, New Jersey College of Medicine, and the Thomas J. White Cardiopulmonary Institute, B.S. Pollak Hospital for Chest Diseases. Assistant Professor of Medicine (Dr. Frank); Instructor in Medicine (Dr. Casanegra); Formerly Research Fellow in Medicine (Dr. Migliori); Associate Professor of Medicine, New Jersey College of Medicine, Associate Director, Thomas J. White Cardiopulmonary Institute, and Established Investigator of the Union County Heart Association (Dr. Levinson).


Footnotes

Received for publication June 2, 1964; accepted June 16.

Work for this study was done while Dr. Frank was a Postdoctoral Research Fellow of the National Heart Institute and Dr. Casanegra a Fellow of the Rockefeller Foundation.

Reprint requests to Department of Medicine, New Jersey College of Medicine, 24 Baldwin Ave, Jersey City, NJ (Dr. Levinson).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1965 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.