You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 116 No. 4, October 1965 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (20)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Studies in Clinical Shock and Hypotension

III. Comparative Effects of Vasopressor Drugs and Dextran

JAY N. COHN, MD; MYRON H. LURIA, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1965;116(4):562-566.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

A LTHOUGH the meaning of the term "shock" is controversial,1 there is general agreement that the cardinal manifestation of both experimental and clinical shock states is a deficiency of blood flow.2-5 The lowered systemic arterial pressure observed clinically often is treated with vasopressor drugs, but their use has been discouraged 6 because of concern that a further reduction in systemic blood flow might result. A variety of therapeutic agents has been recommended to increase blood flow in shock, including vasodilators,7 ganglionic block agents,8 adrenergic blocking agents,9 isoproterenol10 and corticosteroids.11

Dextran has been widely used in the emergency treatment of shock associated with blood loss,12 but it has not been routinely employed in hypotensive patients without a history or signs of blood volume depletion. The ten patients studied in the present report became acutely hypotensive without obvious blood loss. Right atrial pressures were not significantly elevated, indicating the absence of overt right . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

WASHINGTON, DC

From the Veterans Administration Hospital and the Department of Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center. Chief, Hypertension and Clinical Hemodynamics, Veterans Administration Hospital, and Assistant Professor of Medicine and Pharmacology, Georgetown University Medical School (Dr. Cohn). Formerly, Fellow in Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Trainee, Cardiovascular Physiology, National Heart Institute, and presently at Michael Reese Hospital, Chicago (Dr. Luria).


Footnotes

Received for publication Feb 17, 1965; accepted April 20.

Reprint requests to Veterans Administration Hospital, 50 Irving St, NW, Washington, DC 20422 (Dr. Cohn).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1965 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.