You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 117 No. 6, JUNE 1966 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Laboratory Tests in Polymyositis

G. ROY DIESSNER, MD; FRANK M. HOWARD, JR., MD; R. K. WINKELMANN, MD; EDWARD H. LAMBERT, MD; DONALD W. MULDER, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1966;117(6):757-763.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

ALTHOUGH the diagnosis of polymyositis depends on a combination of clinical, pathologic, and laboratory findings, the significance and importance of abnormal results to various laboratory tests in cases of polymyositis is controversial. To determine which tests are helpful in diagnosing, evaluating the activity, and determining the clinical course and prognosis of the disease, data on 102 patients with polymyositis who had not received steroid therapy before their examination at the Mayo Clinic were analyzed. Two of the important laboratory procedures, electromyography and muscle biopsy, require special analysis and will be considered in a subsequent publication.

An analysis of the effects of steroid therapy on the same group of 102 patients was reported previously.1

Materials and Methods

All of the patients were thought to present a characteristic picture of the syndrome of active polymyositis. In 80 of the cases, the disease was chronic; in 11 cases, it was acute and . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

ROCHESTER

From the Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation: Section of Medicine (Dr. Diessner), of Neurology (Drs. Howard and Mulder), of Dermatology (Dr. Winkelmann), and of Physiology (Dr. Lambert).


Footnotes

Received for publication Nov 15, 1965; accepted March 15, 1966.

Reprint requests to 200 First St SW, Rochester, Minn 55901 (Dr. Diessner).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1966 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.