You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 119 No. 2, FEBRUARY 1967 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (4)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Percutaneous Renal Biopsy

An Improved Method Using Television Monitoring and High-Dose Infusion Pyelography

Maj Jean K. Haddad, MC; Maj Richard L. Mani, MC

Arch Intern Med. 1967;119(2):157-160.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In 1954 Kark and Muehrcke described a technique for percutaneous renal biopsy which involved the approximation of the kidney site by the transfer of bony landmarks to the patient's back from a preliminary intravenous pyelogram film and the insertion of the Franklin modification of the Vim-Silverman biopsy needle into the patient's flank to secure renal tissue.1 This method has enjoyed wide acceptance and presently represents the procedure of choice in most institutions.

Unfortunately, even in experienced hands, there is a failure rate of 10% to 20% with this method because of the "blind" approach.2,3 Furthermore, the complication rate is high and includes severe bleeding which may require transfusion or even nephrectomy2,3 and the formation of arteriovenous fistulae at the biopsy site.4 Consequently, there is a reluctance to biopsy the kidney via the percutaneous route, and, at the Massachusetts General Hospital, this method has been abandoned in favor of open surgical . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

USA; USA, Frankfurt/Main, Germany

From the departments of medicine and radiology, US Army General Hospital, Frankfurt/Main, Germany. Maj Haddad is presently with the US Army Hospital, Fort Huachuca, Ariz. Maj Mani is presently with the University of California Medical Center, San Francisco.


Footnotes

Received for publication Aug 11, 1966; accepted Oct. 28.

Reprint requests to the Chief of Medicine, US Army Hospital, Fort Huachuca, Ariz (Maj Haddad).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1967 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.