You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 125 No. 2, February 1970 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Anaphylactoid Reactions With Oral Use of Ampicillin

Richard R. Willis, MD; John P. Phair, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1970;125(2):312-313.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Anaphylaxis is uncommon following the oral administration of penicillin,1 and to our knowledge, only one such reaction following therapy with ampicillin sodium given orally has been reported.2 Recently on our medical service, two patients with bronchogenic carcinoma experienced typical anaphylactoid shock following a single oral dose of ampicillin. A survey of all patients with bronchogenic carcinoma admitted between July 1967, and July 1968 revealed no increase in drug hypersensitivity reactions in patients receiving penicillin therapy procaine penicillin G, given parenterally, and phenoxymethyl penicillin, given orally, however, three of 31 patients receiving ampicillin manifested drug allergy.

Patient Summaries

PATIENT 1.

—A 52-year-old white man was referred for evaluation of diabetes insipidus. He related a history of polydipsia, polyuria, dyspnea on exertion, and weight loss of three months' duration. Previous penicillin therapy had been uneventful.

Physical examination was normal, except for coarse, sticky rales at both lung bases and clubbing . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Cincinnati

From the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Veterans Administration Hospital, and the Infectious Disease Division, Department of Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine.


Footnotes

Received for publication Feb 17, 1969; accepted April 9.

Reprint requests to Cincinnati General Hospital K-4, Cincinnati 45229 (Dr. Phair).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1970 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.