You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 125 No. 4, April 1970 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Physical Diagnosis: The History and Examination of the Patient.

By JA Prior MD, JS Silberstein MD. Price, $10.50. Pp 411, with 261 figures. CV Mosby Co, 3207 Washington Blvd, St. Louis 63103, 1969.

Erik Ask-Opmark, MD, Reviewer
Uppsala, Sweden

Arch Intern Med. 1970;125(4):730-731.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

This compact book now appears (very deservedly) in its third edition. After a brief introduction, the importance of the medical history is emphasized. Family history, social history, and marital history are topics covered in a commendable way. The importance of listening, questioning, observation, and integration of all data is stressed. Perhaps the geographic history as well as some questions about previous medication might have been included (for instance, previous use of oral contraceptives in cases of patients with cerebral thrombosis).

Other chapters cover the examination of various regions of the body. It seems a good thing to have the various organs discussed in the same book, although examination of eyes, ears, nose, throat, and female pelvis, and mental examination are more often regarded separately. The same is true of the last chapter (pediatric examination), which I cannot judge since I never see small children in my practice. However, ophthalmoscopy should . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1970 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.