You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 137 No. 10, October 1977 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (8)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Low-Dose Insulin Therapy in Diabetic Ketoacidosis

A Valid Physiological Approach, Not a Panacea

Robert S. Sherwin, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1977;137(10):1361-1362.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Diabetic ketoacidosis is the result of increased hepatic production of glucose and ketones as well as reduced catabolism of these substrates, primarily by muscle. From a theoretical standpoint, optimal insulin therapy in this disorder would deliver maximally effective concentrations of insulin to target tissues (principally the liver, muscle, and fat) and at the same time minimize complications accompanying insulin treatment, for example, hypokalemia, hypoglycemia, and cerebral edema. The accepted method of treatment for diabetic ketoacidosis has been to inject intermittently high doses (100 to 200 units) of insulin every few hours. To the surprise of many clinicians, recent reports have documented the efficacy of a low-dose continuous infusion method using only 4 to 8 units per hour.1-3 These new observations have raised the following questions: Why should low doses given continuously be as effective as large doses given by intermittent injection? Are there any significant benefits to be derived . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

New Haven, Conn



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1977 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.