You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 145 No. 1, January 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  EDITORIALS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Trends in the Therapy for Mild Hypertension

A Word of Caution

Richard I. Kopelman, MD; Victor J. Dzau, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1985;145(1):47-49.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The management of mild essential hypertension is a fundamental problem in preventive medicine. Mild hypertension is defined as diastolic BP between 90 and 104 mm Hg. It occurs in an estimated 20% of the adult population or 75% of the 60 million Americans with hypertension. Data from various actuarial tables and the Framingham study1 clearly indicate increased cardiovascular risks in these subjects. Accordingly, one might predict that treatment to normalize BP would result in substantial benefit. Indeed, several large-scale clinical trials of pharmacologic intervention have shown reductions in cardiovascular and noncardiovascular morbidity and mortality. These studies2 have frequently been cited as the rationale for aggressive pharmacologic treatment of mild hypertension. However, drug therapy is costly and frequently produces unacceptable side effects.

The Australian trial3 reported fewer cardiovascular complications in patients whose diastolic BP spontaneously fell below 100 mm Hg while receiving a placebo, compared with patients whose . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Division of General Medicine New England Medical Center Tufts University School of Medicine Boston, MA 02111; Hypertension Unit Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston, MA 02115



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.