You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 145 No. 6, June 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editor's Correspondence
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Captopril vs Mild to Moderate Hypertension

Amber Arlington, MPH, MD
Long Beach, Calif

Arch Intern Med. 1985;145(6):1141-1142.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

In the October 1984 Archives, a Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents1 published an article on the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension with low-dose cap- topril. The study only included patients with pretreatment diastolic blood pressures between 92 and 109 mm Hg and concluded that such patients with mild to moderate hypertension can be treated adequately with half of the currently recommended dosage of captopril.

I question the validity of their study, as I question whether the patients identified should have been treated at all. An earlier Veterans Administrative Cooperative Study2 demonstrated no significant benefit in treating patients with pretreatment diastolic blood pressures between 90 and 104 mm Hg, with respect to the prevention of complications of hypertension and the reversal of pretreatment secondary changes. These findings were again supported by a US Public Health Service Hospitals Cooperative Study Group, as cited by Smith.3 . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.