You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 146 No. 9, September 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Books
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Radiation Risks in Medical Imaging,

by J. Whalen, 133 pp, $24.95, Chicago, Year Book Medical Publishers Inc, 1984.

Victor E. Archer, MD, Reviewer
Salt Lake City

Arch Intern Med. 1986;146(9):1665.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

This is a relatively short book designed specifically to help medical practitioners assess the risk of radiation exposure from diagnostic use of roentgenograms and radionuclides and to answer patients' questions as to the cancer and fetal risks involved.

This book achieves these objectives in a concise, clear, and well-written manner. It reviews the physics and biology of ionizing radiation, and includes short sections on ultrasound and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Risk estimates from the BEIR-III report by the National Academy of Sciences are used throughout. This is the best current source. Higher-risk estimates made by Gofman, however, are dismissed on the basis of the anticipated result of a study that has not yet been performed. Although the problems and uncertainties in risk estimates must be mentioned, they tend to be overemphasized in this book. The author emphasizes that even though the risk of cancer from most diagnostic procedures is very . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.