This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (3)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Eugene D. Robin, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1987;147(10):1704-1705.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

This issue of the Archives provides data collected by the Worcester (Mass) Heart Attack Study relevant to changes with time in the utilization of various noninvasive and invasive cardiac diagnostic tests in patients with acute myocardial infarction who were admitted to hospitals in Worcester, Mass.¹

The study is directly relevant to the cost-effectiveness of various cardiac diagnostic procedures. More importantly, the results are also relevant to the general problem of the utilization of diagnostic procedures in all branches of medicine.

The specific results are hardly surprising. The use of three noninvasive and two invasive cardiac diagnostic tests increased dramatically from 1975 to 1984. The use of most diagnostic tests that become incorporated into medical practice, for at least a time, tends to increase dramatically with the passage of time. What is less obvious is that widespread acceptance of tests occurs without convincing evidence that performing a given test improves . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
Department of Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford, CA 94305-5070

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?