You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 147 No. 7, July 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editor's Correspondence
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

To the Editor.—-Reply

Thomas E. Lad, MD; Daniel H. Shevrin, MD; Subhash C. Kukreja, MD
Chicago

Arch Intern Med. 1987;147(7):1361.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Heiselman and Bennett both suggest that cisplatin-induced hypomagnesemia may be the mechanism for the observed reduction in serum calcium levels in our hypercalcemic patients. Cisplatin therapy does induce hypomagnesemia, which, in turn, inhibits parathyroid hormone secretion and action, thus resulting in hypocalcemia.1 We had initially considered this possibility and had obtained serum magnesium and parathyroid hormone levels before and after cisplatin administration in six patients (patients 1, 2, 3, 8,10, and 11 in Table 2 of our article).2 Supplemental magnesium was not given. The posttreatment measurements were made either the day serum calcium decreased to a value below 2.87 mmol/L (11.5 mg/dL) or on day 7. The results are shown in the accompanying Table. As expected, serum magnesium levels decreased significantly with cisplatin treatment. There was, however, no relation between hypomagnesemia and decrease in serum calcium levels, eg, serum magnesium drop was the greatest in patient 10, yet there was . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.