This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Correction  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (69)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

The Reappearance of Streptococcal 'Toxic Shock'

Gene H. Stollerman, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1988;148(6):1268-1270.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Since Pasteur's discovery of streptococci in the blood of a patient dying of sepsis approximately a century ago, the diseases with which the germ has been associated have undergone striking secular variation.¹ In fact, the history of the classification of streptococci is still evolving, because like other infectious diseases, not only do human historical, social, and economic factors cause variations in the frequency, severity, and manifestations of infections due to group A streptococci, but these versatile microorganisms change rapidly—presumably by chromosomal and extrachromosomal DNA alterations, enzyme induction, and by many selective pressures in the environment.

See also p 1421.

The history of scarlet fever,² for example, reminds us that the epidemiology of this clinical syndrome led early students of the disease to resist the notion that a single species could cause the variable syndromes of scarlatina.³ These included the scarlatinal "Nachkrankheiten" of Bela Schick,⁴ namely, glomerulonephritis . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
Rogers Memorial Veterans Administration Medical Center Bedford, MA 01730

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?