This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (5)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

How Do We Know It Works?

Mary E. Charlson, MD; Frederic L. Sax, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1988;148(6):1270-1271.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In an era of cost containment, critical care units have come under increasing scrutiny. The cost of caring for critically ill patients—many of whom do not survive—is high. A few years ago, the debate centered around whether critical care unit resources should be utilized for patients who were unlikely to survive.^1,2 Most of the issues remain unresolved, and are, perhaps, unresolvable. More recently, a number of studies have suggested that efforts to improve utilization of critical care units should concentrate on limiting the admission of low-risk patients.^3-5 Such patients, often with cardiac problems, are usually admitted to units for monitoring. Costs are high, and the potential for benefit is low, given the very low risk of morbidity or mortality. Moreover, such patients may tie up a limited resource, preventing admission of unstable patients who may benefit.⁶ One potential solution is the development of intermediate

See p 1403. . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
515 E 71st St New York, NY 10021; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute National Institutes of Health Bethesda, MD 20892

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?