You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 149 No. 4, April 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editor's Correspondence
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Assessment of Thyroid Function During High-Dosage Furosemide Therapy

J. R. STOCKIGT, MD; D. J. TOPLISS, MB, BS
Melbourne, Australia

Arch Intern Med. 1989;149(4):973.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—In any patient with refractory cardiac failure, it is crucial to rule out hyperthyroidism, but clinical assessment may be extremely difficult, because tachycardia, atrial arrhythmias, muscle wasting, myopathy, and tremor are frequent findings in heart failure per se. Hence, reliance is placed on laboratory assessment of thyroid function. Such patients are generally treated with loop diuretics, sometimes in very high dosage, as advocated in an article in the ARCHIVES by Gerlag and van Meijel,1 who provided data on the efficacy of furosemide, up to 2.5 g daily, in a selected group of patients with refractory congestive cardiac failure, many of whom also had renal insufficiency. If such therapy is used, it is important to be aware of effects that will compromise the biochemical assessment of thyroid function.

The effect of high-dose furosemide on laboratory parameters of thyroid function has only recently been recognized.2-4 The changes . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.