This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

The Heroic Search for Positive Test Results

STEVEN H. WOOLF, MD, MPH; DOUGLAS B. KAMEROW, MD, MPH

Arch Intern Med. 1990;150(12):2451-2458.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The improper ordering of clinical laboratory tests by physicians has generated growing concern in recent years. An estimated 5 billion tests are ordered each year in the United States, and available resources to support such widespread testing are increasingly limited.¹ The growing evidence of significant geographic variations in the use of certain tests²— and that much of this testing may be unnecessary³—has stimulated national interest in the development of practice guidelines and other measures to modify physician practice behavior.⁴ Much of the current concern about the magnitude of laboratory testing that has stimulated these activities has focused on its potential impact on the health care system as a whole, and the principal argument has been economic.⁵ Insufficient attention, however, has been given to the clinical effects of testing on the patient, perhaps because there is a tendency to believe that such effects either . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Washington, DC 20201

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?