This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (15)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

A Legal Perspective

MARSHALL B. KAPP, JD, MPH

Arch Intern Med. 1990;150(3):496-500.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Traditionally, individual physicians have enjoyed a great deal of professional autonomy in practicing the art of medicine, largely free of external restraint on decisions concerning what course of medical action is most appropriate for a particular patient. Lately, however, there has developed a strong push toward the formal creation, dissemination, and enforcement of explicit clinical standards relating to the quality and efficacy of various medical interventions, standards that would guide the decisions and actions of medical practitioners.

This push for formal, explicit clinical standards emanates from a variety of sources for many purposes. Third parties, both public¹ (Wall Street Journal. September 8,1989:B2) and private, ² that pay for health care want to assure that the care they purchase on behalf of their beneficiaries is appropriate and efficacious. Physicians, institutional administrators, and other health care providers have a professional and ethical stake in assuring the quality of care. Clinical standards . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
Department of Community Health Wright State University School of Medicine Box 927 Dayton, OH 45401-0927

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?