This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (18)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

The New Institution

Knight Steel, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1991;151(3):439-442.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Virtually any individual, when required to assume the role of a patient, prefers home care to institutional care of any kind not only for reasons of personal comfort but because even at their best, hospitals are foreign and inimicable environments. Institutional care is associated with a loss of autonomy and control. This is dramatically highlighted by the legal considerations presently taking place over the use of feeding tubes in terminally ill individuals where even a person's right to stop a procedure that invades the body is in question in the institutional setting.

The home, in striking contrast, is recognized by both patient and physician as the patient's "turf."^1,2 It is clear that there are many varieties of home care delineated by both patient need and reimbursement policy. Some home care is clearly "substitutional" in character; under these circumstances home care obviates the need for acute hospital care or custodial . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
Boston University Medical Center Department of Medicine Boston, MA 02118

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?