This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Leonard A. Cobb, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1993;153(10):1165-1166.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

PROGRAMS THAT provide advanced life support outside the hospital have operated for more than two decades. Although cardiac arrest is encountered by paramedic teams only in a small proportion of responses, that condition is particularly important for emergency medical services (EMS) providers. First, cardiac arrest is potentially reversible if treated promptly and appropriately. A second reason for directing attention to this disorder is that survival rates are relatively easy to determine and can be used as one measure of the effectiveness of the EMS system. In paramedic-supported EMS systems, reported rates of survival to hospital discharge have typically ranged from about 11% to 33% for patients with an initial rhythm of ventricular fibrillation (VF).¹ However, two recent articles^2,3 describe considerably lower survival rates, even though standard procedures, training, and equipment seem to have been used. The survival rates for patients with initial rhythms of VF (or ventricular tachycardia) . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
Department of Medicine (Cardiology) University of Washington and Harborview Medical Center (ZA-35) 325 Ninth Ave Seattle, WA 98104

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?