This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

James E. Dalen, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1993;153(12):1415-1418.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

OBJECTIVE TESTS are needed to confirm or exclude the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism because the accuracy of the clinical diagnosis is less than 50%.^1,2 The most accurate tests available for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) are pulmonary angiography¹ and contrast venographhy.³ With technically adequate studies, false-negative tests are rare. Therefore, a normal pulmonary angiogram is sufficient evidence to withhold treatment in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism,⁴ and a normal venogram precludes the need for therapy in patients with suspected DVT.⁵

Unfortunately, pulmonary angiography and venography are expensive, invasive tests that have associated morbidity, and are not available at all hospitals. Therefore, noninvasive tests play a critical role in the evaluation of patients with suspected venous thromboembolism.

Two noninvasive tests for deep venous thromboembolism, impedance plethysmography (IPG) and ultrasonography have an excellent correlation with venograms in patients with proximal DVT of . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?