This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (9)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Futility of Prehospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Like Beauty, in the Eyes of the Beholder

Kevin M. McIntyre, MD, JD

Arch Intern Med. 1993;153(19):2189-2192.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

IN THIS issue of the ARCHIVES, Jecker and Schneiderman¹ criticize the strictness of the American Heart Association (Guidelines) for withholding (and withdrawing) prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)¹ and to this position we take strong exception.

The purpose of an emergency medical services (EMS) system is to save lives that otherwise would be lost and to reduce morbidity and pain. Each EMS system is under continuous supervision by medical professionals to assure that these goals are met. Criteria for decision making must be as clear and objective as possible and the system must be able to demonstrate accountability at every level. A high level of ethical performance is expected. A wide range of legal obligations exist, including the implied consent of the unresponsive or incompetent patient to life-saving and life-prolonging treatment in the absence of credible information to the contrary. The withholding of such care on an arbitrary or impressionistic . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
Boston, Mass

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?