This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Jane M. Orient, MD
Tucson, Ariz

Arch Intern Med. 1993;153(21):2505.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In concluding that the "duty to accept Medicare patients is strong," Gordon and Reiser¹ make a basic assumption, ie, that all persons who have reached the age of 65 years (or met some other eligibility requirement) are, by necessity, Medicare patients each and every time they receive a medical service.

Medicare is an entitlement. One is privileged to take advantage of an entitlement, but not required to do so. The question is worded: "Do physicians have a duty to treat Medicare patients?" Instead, we should ask: "Are physicians obliged to accept government payment for all services rendered to eligible patients?"

The answer to the second question is: obviously not. Our services are ours to give. The government has not yet outlawed charity.

But what if the patient who receives our services is willing and able to pay for them? Has Congress passed a law stating that an American citizen . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?