This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

An Alternative to Physician-Assisted Suicide or Voluntary Active Euthanasia

James L. Bernat, MD; Bernard Gert, PhD; R. Peter Mogielnicki, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1993;153(24):2723-2731.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

PUBLIC AND scholarly debates on legalizing physician-assisted suicide (PAS) and voluntary active euthanasia (VAE) have increased dramatically in recent years._1-5 These debates have highlighted a significant moral controversy between those who regard PAS and VAE as morally permissible and those who do not. Unfortunately, the adversarial nature of this controversy has led both sides to ignore an alternative that avoids moral controversy altogether and has fewer associated practical problems in its implementation. In this article, we suggest that educating chronically and terminally ill patients about the feasibility of patient refusal of hydration and nutrition (PRHN) can empower them to control their own destiny without requiring physicians to reject the taboos on PAS and VAE that have existed for millennia. To be feasible, this alternative requires confirmation of the preliminary scientific evidence that death by starvation and dehydration need not be accompanied by suffering.

DEFINITIONS

Before proceeding, we will . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
White River Junction, Vt and Hanover, NH

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?